Monday, January 21, 2008
"Equality"
In Sally Banes' book we are introduced to three ways in which the ideals of equality helped artist to make certain choices in three distinct ways.The first way was by leveling differences of equality. This was achieved in several ways. One way was by eliminating the star system. Another way was by being decidedly amateurish. This ideal is shown quite nicely in Andy Warhol's "The Kiss" in which ordinary people become the stars and the production quality is so simple that almost anyone could do it. This ideal makes a comment about ideas of class systems. And in some ways by making ordinary people stars Warhol satirizes the star system as a whole. One last thing, by showing homosexuals kissing and interracial kissing Warhol makes stars out of those who would normally not be found in the popular culture of the early 60's.
The second way of equalizing was celebrating the ordinary. In other words by taking something that happens in daily life, or a thing like in John Cage's case "noise" and elevating it to the level of art. In some ways one could call it the affirmative action of the ordinary, a past excluded entity, given the special privilege of being the primary focus of art. This can be seen in Yoko Ono's film "Eye Blink" in the which the most ordinary thing in the world, the blinking of an eye, is slowed down and given the special privilege of being the primary focus of concern. Of course on a broader level one could argue that in seeing a blinking eye we are reminded of the fact that all people, in all the world, do the same thing, blink. Thus equality is not only something to believe in but something that is as natural as a blink.
The third way of equalizing was by the "radical juxtaposition of structure." To put it a different way, when the everything on the canvas, dance or film is seemingly random or else arranged in some sort of "off" manner. The collaboration of ideas together. No film immediately comes to mind. The film "Dots 1 & 2" shows us somewhat this idea. However, to be perfectly honest the film that comes to mind most is a film I saw once called "Cats and Pants" at a traveling avant-garde film festival. It showed numerous pictures and cats and pants and a voice would tell us whether or not we were viewing cats or, maybe, pants. I understand the theory of this part of the democratization process, but to me it seems to be the weakest part. Though, in many cases, the most interesting to watch.
